One snowy January
evening in 1910 about a hundred professors and advanced students of mathematics
from Harvard University gathered in a lecture hall in Cambridge, Massachusetts,
to listen to a speaker by the name of William James Sidis. He had never addressed
an audience before, and he was abashed and a little awkward at the start. His
listeners had to attend closely, for he spoke in a small voice that did not
carry well, and he punctuated his talk with nervous, shrill laughter. A thatch
of fair hair fell far over his forehead and keen blue eyes peered out from what
one of those present later described as a "pixie-like" face. The
speaker wore black velvet knickers. He was eleven years old.
As the boy warmed to his subject, his shyness melted and there fell upon his
listeners' ears the most remarkable words they had ever heard from the lips of
a child. William James Sidis had chosen for the subject of his lecture
"Four-Dimensional Bodies." Even in this selective group of erudite
gentlemen, there were those who were unable to follow all the processes of the
little boy's thought. To such laymen as were present, the fourth dimension, as
it was demonstrated that night, must indeed have perfectly fitted its
colloquial definition: "a speculative realm of incomprehensibly involved
relationships." When it was all over, the distinguished Professor Daniel
F. Comstock of Massachusetts Institute of Technology was moved to predict to
reporters, who had listened in profound bewilderment, that young Sidis would grow
up to be a great mathematician, a famous leader in the world of science.
William
Sidis, who at the age of eleven made the front pages of newspapers all over the
country, was a Harvard student at the time. To explain how he got there, we
must look at his father, the late Boris Sidis. Born in Kiev in 1868, the elder
Sidis had come to this country, learned English, and gone to Harvard, from
which he was graduated in 1894. His specialty was that branch of psychotherapy
which engages to alleviate the nervous diseases and maladjustments by mental
suggestion. He wrote a book called "The Psychology of
Suggestion," and he was greatly interested in experiments in transmitting
suggestion by means of the hypnotic state. It was his belief that in its very
first years the brain is many times more susceptible to impressions than in
later life. When his son was born in 1898, he was born, so to speak, into a
laboratory. Boris Sidis by the time was running a psychotherapeutic institute
in Brookline, Massachusetts. He was an admirer and friend of the late William James,
and he named his son after that great psychologist.
Boris
Sidis began his experiments on his son when little William was two years old.
It appears that he induced a kind of hypnoidal state by the use of alphabet
blocks. The quick results he got delighted his scientific mind. The child
learned to spell and to read in a few months. Within a year he could write both
English and French on the typewriter. At five he had composed a treatise on
anatomy and had arrived at a method of calculating the date on which any day of
the week had fallen during the past ten thousand years. Boris Sidis published
several papers in scientific journals describing his baby's achievements. At
six, the little boy was sent to a Brookline public school, where he astounded
his teachers and alarmed the other children by tearing through seven years of
schooling in six months. When he was eight years old, William proposed a new
table of logarithms, employing 12 instead of the usual 10 as the base. Boris
Sidis published a book about his amazing son, called "Philistine and
Genius," and got into Who's Who in America.
The
wonder child was going on nine when his father tried to enroll him at Harvard.
He could have passed the entrance examinations with ease, but the startled and
embarrassed university authorities would not allow him to take them. He
continued to perform his wonders at home, and began the study of Latin and
Greek. He was not interested in toys or in any of the normal pleasures of small
children. Dogs terrified him. "If I see a dog," William told somebody
at this time, "I must run away. I must hide. I like the cat. I can't play
out, for my mother would have to be there all the time—because of the possibility
that I might see a dog." His chief recreation seems to havebeen going on
streetcar rides with his parents. The elder Sidis explained transfers to him
and interested him in the names of streets and places. Even before he was five,
William had learned to recite all the hours and stations on a complex railroad
timetable. He would occasionally recite timetables for guests as other children
recite Mother Goose rhymes or sing little songs. Those who remember him in
those years say that he had something of the intense manner of a neurotic
adult.
In
1908, at the age of ten, William James Sidis was permitted to enroll at Tufts
College, in Medford. He commuted daily from Brookline with his mother, who was
as interested in his phenomenal mental development as his father was. They
always went to and from the college on streetcars. The youngster attended Tufts
for one year and finally, in 1909, when he was eleven, Harvard permitted him to
enroll there as a special student. He matriculated as a regular freshman the following
year, and thus became a member of the class of 1914. Cotton Mather, in 1674,
had become a Harvard freshman at the age of twelve, and it is probably because
of this distinguished precedent that William Sidis was allowed to matriculate
at that same age. He was a source of wonder to his fellow students and to the
faculty; some of the newspapers assigned reporters to cover "the Sidis
case."
Just
how William was prevailed upon to speak before the learned scholars in January
of his first year at Harvard is lost to the record, but it is known that he
took an eager interest in hearing others lecture and joined easily in group
discussions of metaphysics. In his spare time he began to compose two grammars,
one Latin, the other Greek. The pressure of his studies and his sudden fame
began to tell upon him, however, and it wasn't long after his notable discourse
that he had a general breakdown. His father was running a sanatorium in
Portsmouth, New Hampshire, at the time, and William was rushedoff there. When
finally he came back to Harvard, he was retiring and shy; he could not be
persuaded to lecture again; he began to show a marked distrust of people, a
fear of responsibility, and a general maladjustment to his abnormal life. He
did not mingle much with students and he ran from newspapermen, but they
cornered him, of course, on the day of his graduation as a Bachelor of Arts in
1914. He was sixteen years old. He wore long trousers then, and he faced the
reporters who descended on the Yard with less of a feeling of embarrassment
than he had as a knickered child. But definite phobias had developed in him.
"I want to live the perfect life," William told the newspapermen.
"The only way to live the perfect life is to live it in seclusion. I have always
hated crowds." For "crowds" it was not difficult to read
"people." Among those who graduated with William James Sidis that day
were Julius Spencer Morgan; Gilbert Seldes; and
Vinton Freedley and Laurence Schwab, the musical-comedy producers. The
reporters paid no attention to them.
At
sixteen, William James Sidis was a large boy, and when he entered Harvard Law
School, he was no longer the incongruous figure he had been. The newspapers had
little interest in his comings and goings. He attended law school quietly for
three years and was apparently a brilliant student, but his main interest was
mathematics, and in 1918 he accepted a teaching position at a university in
Texas. His fame preceded him, but even if it hadn't, the extreme youth of this
mathematics instructor would have been enough to set him off as a curiosity. He
found himself the centre of an interest that annoyed and dismayed him. He
suddenly gave up his position and returned bitterly and quietly to Boston,
where he lived obscurely for some months.
It was
on May 1st, 1919, that young Sidis's name reached the front pages of the
newspapers again. With about twenty other young persons, he took part in a
Communistic demonstration in Roxbury and was hauled into the municipal court as
one of the ringleaders of the group, as, indeed the very individual who had
carried the horrific red flag in their parade. On the witness stand, Sidis
proved to be more forthright and candid than tactful. He announced to a shocked
court that there was for him no god but evolution; asked if he believed in what
the American flag stands for, he said only to a certain extent. At one point he
launched on an explanation of the Soviet form of government, for the
instruction of the magistrate. His Marxist leaning had developed over a period
of several years. When the United States entered the war, he had announced
himself as a conscientious objector, and on several occasions had delivered
himself of the opinion that the troubles of the world were caused by
capitalism.
A policeman
who had helped break up the parade of the radicals identified Sidis as the man
who had carried the red flag. The officer said that he had asked Sidis why he
was not carrying the American flag, and that Sidis had replied, "To hell
with the American flag!" Returning to the stand, the famous prodigy hotly
denied that he had ever spoken to the witness and that he had ever said to
anyone, "To hell with the American flag!" He repeated that he was
opposed to war and that he believed in a socialized form of government. After a
pause, he announced that, as a matter of fact, he had carried
an American flag, whereupon, to the amazement of the courtroom, he pulled a
miniature American flag from his pocket. He was sentenced to eighteen months in
jail for inciting to riot, and assault. He appealed, and while out on bail of
$5,000 disappeared from the state in which he had startled erudite professors
and shocked patriotic policemen. It marked the beginning of a new and curious
mode of life for the young man.
For five years after that, William James Sidis seems to have achieved the
"perfect life" he had spoken of on the day of his
graduation, the life of seclusion. Apparently he drifted from city to city,
working as a clerk, or in some other minor capacity, for a salary only large
enough for him to subsist on. In 1924 he was dragged back into the news when a
reporter found him working in an office in Wall Street, at twenty-three dollars
a week. He was dismayed at being discovered. He said all he wanted was to make
just enough to live on and to work at something that required a minimum of
mental effort. The last few reporters who went down to his office to interview
him didn't get to see him. He had quit his job and disappeared again.
Two
years later, in 1926, Dorrance & Company, a Philadelphia publishing house
which prints "vanity" books―that is, books published at the authors'
expense―got out a volume called "Notes on the Collection of
Transfers." It was written by one Frank Folupa. Frank Folupa, some
pitilessly ingenious reporter discovered, was none other than William James
Sidis. Again he was run down and interviewed. He announced that he had been for
a long time a "peridromophile"―that is, a collector of streetcar
transfers. He had coined the word himself. His book (now out of print) ran to
three hundred pages and was a scholarly and laborious treatise on the origin,
nature, and classification of nothing more nor less than the slips of paper
streetcar conductors hand to passengers when they ask for transfers. Many a
psychologist and analyst must have been interested to read in the papers that
the genius of the precocious child who had astounded the academic world sixteen
years before had flowered in this bizarre fashion. The book is worthy of
examination. Sidis wrote a preface to the volume, which began this way:
"This book is a description of what is, so far as the Author is aware, a
new kind of hobby, but one which seems on the face of it to be as reasonable,
as interesting, and as instructive as any other sort of collection fad. This is
the collection of street car transfers and allied forms. The Author himself has
already collected over 1600 such forms." The preface revealed, in another
place, that the Author was not without a certain humor. "We may
mention," it read, "the geographical and topographical interest, both
in the exploration and in the analysis of the transfers themselves. There is
also the interesting sidelights which such a collection throws on the politics
in which transit companies are necessarily involved; though we hardly recommend
that this political interest be carried far enough to induce the collector to
take sides in any such disputes. And again: "One may derive much amusement
out of transfers―It is said that a Harvard College student got on a street car
and, wishing an extra ride, asked the conductor for a transfer. When asked
'Where to?' he said, 'Anywhere.' The conductor winked and said, 'All right.
I'll give you a transfer to Waverly.' The student was afterwards laughed at
when he told the story, and was informed that the asylum for the feeble-minded
was located at Waverly." Sidis also included in his preface some verses he
had written when he was fourteen years old. They begin:
From subway trains at Central,
a transfer get, and go To Allston or Brighton or to Somerville, you know; On cars from Brighton transfer to Cambridge Subway east And get a train to Park Street, or Kendall Square, at least. |
"We know," the Author concludes, "someone who was actually
helped to take the right route by remembering a snatch from one of these
verses." The book discusses all kinds of transfers: standard types, Ham
type, Pope type, Smith type, Moran type, Franklin Rapid transfers, Stedman
transfers. Of the last (to give you an idea), Mr. Sidis wrote, "Stedman
transfers: This classification refers to a peculiar type turned out by a
certain transfer printer in Rochester, N. Y. The peculiarities of the typical
Stedman transfer are the tabular time limit occupying the entire right-hand end
of the transfer (see Diagram in Section 47) and the row-and-column combination
of receiving route (or other receiving conditions) with the half-day that we
have already discussed in detail."
The year after his book came out (it apparently sold only to a few other
peridromophiles), Sidis came back to New York City and once again got a job as
a clerk with a business firm. To his skill and experience in general office
work, the mathematical genius had now added, ironically, the ability to operate
an adding machine with great speed and accuracy, and was fond of boasting of
this accomplishment. He lived at 112 West 119th Street, where he made friends with
Harry Freedman, the landlord, and his sister, a Mrs. Schlectien. Sidis is no
longer with them and they will not tell you where he has gone, but they will
forward any mail that comes for him. They are fond of the young man and
appreciate his desire to avoid publicity. "He had a kind of chronic
bitterness, like a lot of people you see living in furnished rooms," Mr.
Freedman recently told a researcher into the curious history of William James
Sidis. Sidis used to sit on an old sofa in Freedman's living room and talk to
him and his sister. Sidis told them he hated Harvard and that anyone who sends
his son to college is a fool―a boy can learn more in a public library.
Frequently he talked about his passion for collecting transfers. "He can
tell you how to reach any street in any city of the United States on a single
streetcar fare," said Mr. Freedman in awe and admiration. It seems that
Sidis corresponds with peridromophiles in a number of other cities, and keeps
up on the streetcar and transfer situation in that way. Once the young man
brought down from his room a manuscript he was working on and asked Mrs.
Schlectien if he might read "a few chapters" to her. She said it
turned out to be a book on the order of "Buck Rogers," all about
adventures in a future world of wonderful inventions. She said it was swell.
William
James Sidis lives today, at the age of thirty-nine, in a hall bedroom
of Boston's shabby south end. For a picture of him and his activities,
this record is indebted to a young woman who recently succeeded in interviewing
him there. She found him in a small room papered with the design of huge,
pinkish flowers, considerably discolored. There was a large, untidy bed and an
enormous wardrobe trunk, standing half open. A map of the United States hung on
one wall. On a table beside the door was a pack of streetcar transfers neatly
held together with an elastic. On a dresser were two photographs, one
(surprisingly enough) of Sidis as the boy genius, the other a sweet-faced girl
with shell-rimmed glasses and an elaborate marcel wave. There was also a desk
with a tiny, ancient typewriter, a World Almanac, a dictionary, a
few reference books, and a library book which the young man's visitor at one
point picked up. "Oh, gee," said Sidis, "that's just one of
those crook stories." He directed her attention to the little typewriter.
"You can pick it up with one finger," he said, and did so.
William Sidis at thirty-nine is a large, heavy man, with a prominent jaw, a
thickish neck, and a reddish mustache. His light hair falls down over his brow
as it did the night he lectured to the professors in Cambridge. His eyes have
an expression which varies from the ingenious to the wary. When he is wary, he
has a kind of incongruous dignity which breaks down suddenly into the gleeful abandon
of a child on holiday. He seems to have difficulty in finding the right words
to express himself, but when he does, he speaks rapidly, nodding his head
jerkily to emphasize his points, gesturing with his left hand, uttering
occasionally a curious, gasping laugh. He seems to get a great and ironic
enjoyment out of leading a life of wandering irresponsibility after a childhood
of scrupulous regimentation. His visitor found in him a certain childlike
charm.
Sidis
is employed now, as usual, as a clerk in a business house. He said that he
never stays in one office long because his employers of fellow-workers
soon find out that he is the famous boy wonder, and he can't tolerate a
position after that. "The very sight of a mathematical formula makes me
physically ill," he said. "All I want to do is run an adding machine,
but they won't let me alone." It came out that one time he was offered a
job with the Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Company. It seems that the
officials fondly believed the young wizard would somehow be able to solve all
their technical problems. When he showed up for work, he was presented with a
pile of blueprints, charts, and papers filled with statistics. One of the
officials found him an hour later weeping in the midst of it all. Sidis told
the man he couldn't bear responsibility, or intricate thought, or
computation―except on an adding machine. He took his hat and went away.
Sidis
has a new interest which absorbs him at the moment more than streetcar
transfers. This is the study of certain aspects of the history of the American
Indian. He teaches a class of half a dozen interested students once every two
weeks. They meet in his bedroom and arrange themselves on the bed and floor to
listen to the one-time prodigy's intense but halting speech. Sidis is chiefly
concerned with the Okamakammessett tribe, which he describes as having had a
kind of proletarian federation. He has written some booklets on Okamakammessett
lore and history, and if properly urged, will recite Okamakammessett poetry and
even sing Okamakammessett songs. He admitted that his study of the
Okamakammessetts in an outgrowth of his interest in Socialism. When the May Day
demonstration of 1919 was brought up by the young woman, he looked at the
portrait of the girl on his dresser and said, "She was in it. She was one
of the rebel forces." He nodded his head vigorously, as if pleased with
that phrase, "I was the flag-bearer," he went on. "And do you
know what the flag was? Just a piece of red silk." He gave his curious
laugh. "Red silk," he repeated. He made no reference to the picture
of himself in the days of his great fame, but his interviewer later learned
that on one occasion, when a pupil of his asked him point-blank about his infant
precocity and insisted on a demonstration of his mathematical
prowess, Sidis was restrained with difficulty from throwing him out of the
room.
Sidis
revealed to his interviewer that he has another work in progress: a
treatise on floods. He showed her the first sentence: "California
hasacquired considerable renown on account of its alleged weather." It
seems that he was in California some ten years ago during his wanderings. His
visitor was emboldened, at last, to bring up the prediction, made by Professor
Comstock of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology back in 1910, that the
little boy who lectured that year on the fourth dimension to a gathering of
learned men would grow up to be a great mathematician, a famous leader in the
world of science. "It's strange," said William James Sidis, with a
grin, "but, you know, I was born on April Fools' Day."
―Jared
L. Manley 1
_________
1 In The Years with Ross Thurber wrote: "It was one of the 'Where Are They Now?' series, for which I did the rewrite (Grossett & Dunlap, 1957, p. 210)." But Jared Manley was Thurber's pseudonym. "Bernstein writes: 'In early 1936 Thurber began to write (really rewrite, since some of The New Yorker's best reporters, like Eugene Kinkead, were doing the research) a number of short, retrospective profiles. Bernstein also reveals that Jared L. Manley was a name that Thurber cobbled together when writing his first piece about an old boxer based on the initials of the boxer John L. Sullivan and Manley based on "the manly art of self-defense".'" —Privacy, Information and Technology
1 In The Years with Ross Thurber wrote: "It was one of the 'Where Are They Now?' series, for which I did the rewrite (Grossett & Dunlap, 1957, p. 210)." But Jared Manley was Thurber's pseudonym. "Bernstein writes: 'In early 1936 Thurber began to write (really rewrite, since some of The New Yorker's best reporters, like Eugene Kinkead, were doing the research) a number of short, retrospective profiles. Bernstein also reveals that Jared L. Manley was a name that Thurber cobbled together when writing his first piece about an old boxer based on the initials of the boxer John L. Sullivan and Manley based on "the manly art of self-defense".'" —Privacy, Information and Technology
2 Norbert
Weiner, who was at the math club meeting wrote: "Young Sidis, who was then
eleven, was obviously a brilliant and interesting child. His interest was
primarily in mathematics. I well remember the day at the Harvard Mathematics
Club in which G. C. Evans, now the retired head of the department of
mathematics of the University of California and Sidis's life-long friend,
sponsored the boy in a talk on the four-dimensional regular figures. The talk
would have done credit to a first- or second-year graduate student of any age,
although all the material it contained was known elsewhere and was available in
the literature. The theme had been made familiar to me by E. Q. Adams, a
companion of my Tufts days. I am convinced that Sidis had no access to existing
sources, and that the talk represented the triumph of the unaided efforts of a
very brilliant child (Ex-Prodigy, Simon & Schuster, p. 131 -
132)."
4 Cf. The Failure Myth by Dan Mahony: "Research shows that most child
prodigies go on to lead productive lives. As did Sidis."
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario